Certainly what's come through in the testimony and the questioning from both sides of this committee is that we want to make sure we get this right, and get it right out of the box. Still, we understand there are veterans who realize the importance of the creation of this position and know that time is of the essence as well.
To that end, would you be willing to comment on the fact that we're not reinventing the wheel? We have some excellent examples, and I think we've received some great testimony here at the committee as well to shed light on past experiences. When we look at the ombudsman for national defence and the experiences we've received there, does it give us a step up? Does that give us a foot ahead in the creation of this new position of ombudsman for Veterans Affairs Canada?