Well, I think the analogy you're talking about is more related to the Veterans Charter, in the sense that there were a lot of components put into the GI Bill of Rights that Canada then introduced at the end of the Second World War, which became known in Canadian parlance as the Veterans Charter. It really became the foundation for the development of Canada's social service infrastructure, because with one million returning men and women after the Second World War, Canada didn't have in place at that time the social programs it needed to avoid the difficulties that occurred at the end of the First World War when soldiers came home, many of whom were destitute after the war. So the Veterans Charter came into being at that time. It became the rough equivalent of the GI Bill of Rights.
Over the years, it became apparent that the charter did not provide our younger veterans with what they needed, because it had evolved to become a support to an aging population. So we call this one, colloquially, the new Veterans Charter, because it has replaced the former one. But it's not in the same ballpark, I think, of what we're talking about in terms of a bill of rights, from what I understand the statements to be, if I may say that.