Thank you. I'm glad for the explanation, but I think it's up to this committee to recommend in the future that if there is a gap and that 65 shouldn't be there because of changes in society, we should look at that. It shouldn't be an arbitrary thing to cut off.
When somebody is disabled and unable to be rehabilitated, how much support do we give to the spouse at that point? Is it something we should be looking at to make sure they can take some training to get to the decent job level they need to support the person who can't be rehabilitated? What level of support is in there, and is it something we should be looking at to address correctly?