Well, that's the balancing act. You're asking a lawyer, and if you ask a lawyer to write down in black and white how something should be defined, you're in trouble, basically, because it could be very lengthy. But it will also be very precise.
My understanding of the efficiency of a bill of rights is that it's basically its simplicity in comprehension, so that the buy-in from the vets and from the people who inhabit the system of Veterans Affairs will be easy. The trade-off is there. I don't think you want to become extremely complex legally, but simple and clear, from a common sense point of view, so that people can relate to what's in it. I think that's the ideal.
It's a balancing act, I admit, but it's an important one for people to understand what's involved.