I'm not saying we're 100%, but we do have standards that tell us the risk assessment. That's why the tests are not enough. It's an assessment by a specialized psychologist. We assess and we make a decision, and sometimes we're wrong and sometimes we're right. As you know, decisions in Canada can always be appealed. I don't mind that. There are grievance levels, human rights, and I go and fight with them and I don't have a problem with that.
But mostly my experience with that is that people understand. We explain the decision. Although we're in the military or the RCMP, we don't say, George, you're not going. No, it's George, here's the problem, here's the situation. Most of the time, 95%, I can tell you that the member agrees that yes, it's a good idea.
We're not there to have a confrontation. It doesn't help. If all my decisions go to confrontation and appeal, my boss will say, Dr. Belzile, you're very good, but you're costing the force too much, or the RCMP. So we're trying to have a solution, not a problem. At my level, it's a solution, not a problem.