Thanks very much.
I do appreciate the points made in this last round. I understand fully the importance of trying to profile these people before we expose them to combat or to the theatre, as well as trying to harden them prior to deployment, or at least allow them to get some appreciation for what they're going to face. I think that's imperative. But sometimes the horrors are so great that there's nothing that can prepare them for those, which was certainly brought out in Tuesday's testimony as well.
I want to get a sense of what you said, that the earlier the intervention on a psychological problem.... Most often in our committee, we focus on the care of the veteran farther down the road, after he's been released and what have you, but what you're saying is that the earlier it's detected the better. So are you comfortable that our medical people on the front lines in the theatre, our senior officers or military personnel, are receiving sufficient training in identifying some of the cues and picking up on some of the triggers, so they can say, listen, we're going to have a problem with this guy and we need an intervention immediately? I would think you wouldn't have enough trained personnel, or psychologists in the field, who would be able to do that.
So just give me your sense of front-line triage on—