There's a speaking order here. I'm just going to give a comment. We have a list here and there are some people being added to it.
I get the sense that there are two questions on the table that we're dealing with right now, and a couple of other ones come after that.
One of them is addressing some of the questions of what type of legal standing the document will have. I would be willing to undertake, on the committee's behalf, a letter asking the minister's office to lay out their rendition of that. That's one.
There's another issue about which I'm going to be blunt when I say it is, frankly, beneath us. It's this idea of renaming it, because at the end of the day, even if there is a vote taken in this committee to try to suggest a renaming of the document—