I agree with both of my colleagues. I think the invitation has to go forward to the group of witnesses we have listed here. If they're able to make it, that's wonderful. If they're not, I think Mr. Chadderton will make a pretty fine representative of all of the groups. I think we owe them the courtesy of inviting them so they have an opportunity to speak if they so choose. If we end up with two witnesses, then so be it, but at least we've extended the invitations.
On April 26th, 2007. See this statement in context.