Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I have a fairly short question. I'd like to follow up with something my colleague, Mr. Valley, was pursuing. It was some evidence we heard from a physician with the military in relation to post-traumatic stress disorder, part of the overall health review.
If I understood correctly, less than 10 years ago, after many complaints by former military and studies by the then defence and veterans affairs committee, it was ultimately decided by the government that something should be done for injuries at work, much as you see in the civilian world with provincial compensation programs. So an attempt was made more or less to mirror that for our military—none of us, I'm sure, would disagree with that notion—and at the same time, by providing military personnel with access to disability benefits while they're still in the service, to encourage them to come forward rather than to hide injuries for fear of being let go. So there were certainly a lot of positive benefits there.
I think the point of the testimony was that with that came a lot of extra demand on the medical resources of the military. Whereas they wouldn't have been concerned about the paperwork and the processing of a disability-type claim on top of the regular medical services to the military, they now had the two. I think the issue, then, was human resources in the medical field to deal with this.
Is your review going to deal, among many other questions, with that particular question?