It's a very good question. Brian put forth the principle that a veteran is a veteran is a veteran. We didn't mean it only to a war veteran is a war veteran is a war veteran, because there are individuals, especially since 1990, who have had pretty harrowing service for this country.
The principles of a needs-based versus entitlement-based approach, according to the Gerontological Advisory Council and anyone we've consulted with, fit both groups. The new Veterans Charter was meant to provide services and benefits for immediate support for transition to civilian life of much younger veterans, and the health review is meant to finish that process off, as was done for the war veterans, by providing a needs-based approach when they need it.
Their average age is not 28 or 29; it's actually 56. There are 600,000 Canadian Forces veterans out there. There are 150,000 who are over age 65 and about 7,000 or 8,000 over age 85. So although the need is not great there, it's certainly there. The Canadian Forces veterans organizations, the three of them, which have been working with us on this, endorse—at least they do up to now—the findings of the Gerontological Advisory Council's report, Keeping the Promise, and they expect that the principle of a veteran is a veteran is a veteran will be addressed in the context of the review.
That's a long-winded answer, but yes, we're very much seized with the idea that this, to the extent we can do it, is a needs-based system that won't create new categories of veteran eligibility.