When you were accessing your report, was Mr. Sweet's question about what consultations were there with veterans...? Does your report also go on the premise of the benefit of the doubt? As you know, the new charter states that, and the previous minister and the current minister and many of us have said the same thing: that the benefit of the doubt should go to the veteran and/or the family. But of course that's easy to say and maybe fiscally difficult to do. So was your report based on that premise?
On May 10th, 2007. See this statement in context.