I won't be long so that David has lots of time to continue.
An important and valuable point is made about looking at needs as the veteran has made a choice to ask for help, either with family prompting or his or her own prompting. Some may avoid asking for help for the longest time, feeling, as many people do, they don't need it, even though they do. There's the needs way of looking at it. The other is, what can we do as a society to keep people in their homes longer? In other words, what are the needs relative to Mr. Smith's ability to stay in his home longer and therefore have a better quality of life, and at the same time it costs less. We see this in the nursing homes available to the general population. It seems to me, before I ask you to comment, that we have these silos, and it's the way bureaucracies work, where you have these bureaucracies that see their programs in isolation from other programs. For example, CMHC has programs to help people repair their homes. If you could invest a couple of thousand bucks into fixing a bathroom or repairing a roof in an older home, but keep the senior there that much longer, you'd save a lot of money, and they'd have a better quality of life.
Could you comment on the needs, but at the same time the broader element that staying in your home as long as you can is better for you, your family, and society as a whole?