I regret that I wasn't able to attend, but I was never scheduled to attend, and neither was my colleague Mr. Sweet. I'm sure there was a lot to learn and a lot to be gained by going directly to the bases.
I listened carefully to what my colleague Mr. St. Denis has mentioned and also to what my colleague Mr. Anders has mentioned. I heard a bit of a mix in there of things that fall under Veterans Affairs and things that fall under Defence.
I'm wondering whether it would be possible for us to spend some time casually after the meeting to draw the line between the two, and if there are recommendations members on this committee feel should be forwarded to the defence committee, perhaps we should do that. There's a definite line between what is Defence and what is Veterans Affairs, but because we're dealing with the same people eventually, it would be rather nice to be able to follow through smoothly. A couple of the things Rob mentioned and a couple of the things Brent mentioned fell into those categories. On this trip you were basically dealing with serving members, so that would definitely be the Defence purview, but there was a mix.
Are you shaking your heard to mean no, Roger? There was a mix.