No, I don't.
I'm just saying that if we're going to look at it and be talking about the programs they may have—why would he be coming if he wasn't going to—and we are talking about having somebody in from another country on the ombudsman, what were we looking at? We were looking at comparing an ombudsman in this country versus the benefits of what other ombudsmen have had in other similar countries.
What I'm suggesting is that if we're going to have somebody come in from the States to talk about their issues with their veterans, then we should be talking to other countries about their programs for their veterans. This is what I see in regard to Mr. Grossman; I'd have absolutely no concern having him come in for that. I think this might be something we should consider. If we're going to build on our program, maybe we should look at the United States, England, France, Italy, and the sorts of programs they actually supply for their veterans. I think that's where Mr. Grossman would be an excellent candidate, likely.
But I just don't see having this witness alone coming in to talk about their veterans, outside of our Canadian ones.