There's no doubt about it, whether you're looking at a veteran or a senior, it doesn't make any difference. It is better for the person, better for the individual, and it's certainly more economical to provide the necessary care and support to keep the individual at home as long as possible. This, I believe, is part of the policy of Veterans Affairs now. This is, for instance, why they have the VIP program. This is one of the reasons.
I'm old already, but when I get older I hope I'll be able to stay at home. Sure, there's no doubt about it, if people have no family, for example, we have places like the Perley; we have places like Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, which would be a good place to go. To get a veteran and shove him around like a piece of merchandise or something else, or like the railroad shoves the empty trucks down into a siding, out of sight, no, that is not it. I would say that we would certainly be very much in favour of keeping the veteran at home as long as possible. This, I believe, is the policy of Veterans Affairs. I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure they are more and more inclined towards providing assistance in the form of things like the VIP.