Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Bev raises an important and helpful issue, speaking for myself and maybe my colleagues, but they will speak for themselves.
This could be a helpful part of the review, and Mr. Marchand said in his testimony a little while ago that there are indeed two general categories of cases, those that come out of the domestic operations and those that come out of the international operations, if I could characterize it that way. So it certainly makes sense to have, at a minimum, those two separate points of view.
I see the committee's decision to take an international view of this. It fits nicely into having a view of the domestic side. I don't think we have to go to every base, every operation, just like we don't have to visit every overseas operation. So a reasonable sampling of both, I think, does make sense.
In fact, the travel could even be not tied together in terms of time, but linked in terms of it not being too far apart, so that we have binocular vision. So I don't see that we would object, but I don't want this to be seen as putting aside a decision to visit some overseas operations. I see this as a complement to that, and any planning for this should include both, as much as is reasonably possible.