I will just respond to you and say yes, I agree with your analysis that things are changing rapidly. Not only young people, but we're getting a lot more women in the military, and I think this is going to have another effect on us, which we can't quite yet identify.
The relationship between the military and those serving has changed over time. People are no longer content to entirely accept the “I say, you do” philosophy and that it is simply about service to your country. There's much more about the individual and care for the individual.
I agree with your issues about a seamless transition. That's one of the areas that we're very keen to overcome.
In terms of getting health care professionals, that is always a challenge. I'd like to say that, so far, we haven't really found a problem that we can't overcome with that, but the principal problem for us has been getting many of our veterans to accept that they have PTSD and to take care. That has been our real problem.
So one of the things we are really interested in doing here is issuing people a card with a chip in it when they leave the military so that every time they come into contact with the health service, we can pick up the data and can track them through the system and see what's happening over time. On the basis of this information, we will be able to have analysis of what's happening to each cohort as it goes through.
At the moment, we're flying blind. What we are lacking is information. We want to have this seamless connection between the military and what they're doing in civilian life, so that we have access to the records and can catch all that information and work with the veterans' cohorts through the services association to identify problems as they emerge and then be able to respond to them.
We do not have enough information, in my view.