My point may be somewhat akin to what Ms. Hinton was saying earlier. I spoke about it briefly as well. It has to do with the concept of service on the part of veterans.
My husband was sure that the Department of Veterans Affairs would provide services only to those who took part in the Second World War or who suffered physical injury—those who lost a leg or an arm. That is really what he thought.
There could be a marketing effort with veterans to make the services provided by the department better known. Something must also be done about the perception people have about the services available. What is a veteran? Who are these services for? They are not just for those who lost an arm or a leg in combat.