My first response is, in terms of the study we're undertaking, that what you point out is correct. We're not undertaking the study in Quebec. But I want to emphasize that we have not forgotten Quebec.
If you look at the broader work that we're doing in the context of the health care review and if you look, for example, at the “Keeping the Promise” document and the work I've done myself over the last decade or so; in fact, the “Keeping the Promise” document relies heavily, in a lot of the service innovations that it talks about, both in the areas of screening and in some of the concepts around the single-entry model, on current cutting-edge practices in Quebec.
In many ways, in terms of the “Keeping the Promise” document and other work we're doing, we looked at Quebec as a model in many areas of our program designed for elderly people. So Quebec has not been forgotten. It actually plays a very important role in terms of the thinking we've undertaken around the veterans health services review.
I wasn't exactly clear on a specific question to address, outside of my general comment. I don't think I have anything more to add to that. However, if you could reformulate a question, I would be delighted to reply to it.