It may be less a matter of frequency, although if you look at the original Veterans Charter between 1946 and 1953, I think there were three separate periods when that was amended and changed. By the time of the Korean War, there was a statute passed called the Veterans Benefit Act, which added to the World War II Veterans Charter.
To answer your question, though, we try to focus on the wellness and the successful transition to civilian life, with the benefits and services that are there, and allow experience, plus a formal evaluation that we're now undergoing for the new Veterans Charter, to identify gaps. We've already identified some gaps in family support. We're doing this with a large advisory group called the New Veterans Charter Advisory Group, which we just met with today.
On the degree of economic support while someone's on rehabilitation, the question may be, for instance, is it adequate to ask a family of four to survive on 75% of a private's salary for two years while a private is going through rehabilitation? It's better than what was there pre-charter, but it may not be a reasonable thing to ask someone to do. In other words, you may be setting individuals up for failure by not providing an adequate amount of income support while they're going through rehabilitation.
The other area, then, in addition to family services, is the mental health area. We've made extensive progress within existing authority, but I think it's pretty imperative to look at gaps in that area.
As to timing, when we have the information that's there and when the government of the day is satisfied that it's ready to move and has the resources, that's when the movement will be there. We want to build, as I think anybody would want to build, a fairly strong consensus among modern veterans that we've identified where the gaps are. The foundation of the new Veterans Charter is solid, but we've identified where the key gaps are and we can fill them in a timely fashion.