I think when we look at pre-charter, it will give you a bit better context for considering that. We had run programs—for example, the disability pension program was an entitlement-based program. In other words, if you had the disability you got this much money; it didn't matter whether you needed it; you just got it; it was a compensatory program. That was the only program we had, so our policy framework for helping somebody was all entitlement-based. What would happen—it wasn't the intention it would happen—over time is the only way you could get more money or more support was to show that you were more ill. If you were more ill you could certainly get that, but you didn't want a system in place that encouraged that. So we had a number of policies that were entitlement-based rather than wellness and needs-based.
So what we are attempting to do is revise as many policies as we can, especially those focused on the modern veteran, to make sure we're responding to the need and not creating a financial dependency that inadvertently encourages illness. That was the policy foundation of the new Veterans Charter. It's not by any means a way of saying there are going to be benefits denied to individuals. In fact, some benefits will be offered to individuals who have greater need, which we haven't been able to do up until now.