That's understandable.
I'm going to be the devil's advocate now. I always thought that an ombudsman was like a watchdog in a department. We used to have Bruce Hood, who was the airline commissioner for complaints to the airlines. We had the DND ombudsman, and we've had all kinds of ombudsmen—banking ombudsmen and all kinds of people. When you ask the general public, you find the perception that they're a watchdog in a department.
I'm just throwing this out here. It is a pretty sweet deal when DVA has an ombudsman, who is supposed to keep an eye on the department to see if there are any problems or anomalies, to see what recommendations he can offer so that the department can improve its services. But when there are people from DVA employed within the veterans ombudsman office, some people could say that there's an awfully close link there, that there's not much independence between the two. There is a risk that you could handcuff the ombudsman and his people. For example, they might be reluctant to issue a hard-hitting report or something of that nature. Is that perception real or false?