Thank you, Greg.
I want to clarify one thing in Mr. Stoffer's remarks. This isn't personal--it's this thing we go back and forth on. I don't question his commitment to veterans as an individual, because he does remarkable things with the veterans community in his home town. I'll admit that anywhere--and I've been to some of those events. But I'll just tell you that the rubber never hits the road in his party. He belongs to a party that has a dismal record on support of our veterans and our men and women in uniform, so that's the point I'm making. I don't question his personal commitment for a minute; I'm just questioning where his party is going on these issues. One of these days I want to see him break party ranks and stand up and support our men and women in the House of Commons with his vote.
Now I'm going to move on to the other one. Ste. Anne's is on the cutting edge with some of the programs they've developed, and they're ongoing. They have an impact on our national delivery of these programs, because the expertise really does rest down there at Ste. Anne's. It's sort of the crown jewel of our operation, when it comes to operational stress injury and post-traumatic stress disorder, in the work they're doing. That work is ongoing and the research is ongoing. We're very proud of what they're doing. In fact, we were down there less than a month ago, and I believe they will be up and running with the residential treatment facility in November. Is that right, Suzanne? Then families can actually be there on site while the family member is receiving treatment. We're looking forward to that, because the veterans communities have asked for that and it's something we're delivering on.
One of the things we should do--I think the committee did it in the last Parliament--is visit Ste. Anne's. It would be worthwhile for the committee to go down to hear from some of the professionals on the ground, because they truly are committed to what they're doing and have done a tremendous job. We can be very proud of them.