No, it's not something we explained to this point.
Programs that are direct benefits to clients are indexed every year at 3%. So the numbers you see here, although they may look as if they've flatlined--for instance, health care and the re-establishments--have been indexed, and if it weren't for that indexing, they would be lower. And they would be lower because of the decline in the veteran population.
So the number of veterans is going down. We're losing roughly 20,000 veterans per year of the World War II and Korean War veterans. So we're losing them at a very fast pace, but because the numbers had been indexed, the program costs are indexed, the actual expenditures are staying relatively constant.