That's completely understandable, but Mr. Sweet, as you know, I have moved several motions in the House of Commons, which were adopted, and I'm still waiting for the adoption of those motions. Motions only advise the government what to do; they're not binding on government.
One of the most frustrating things is when you move a motion, as I did—my veterans charter motion in 2006—which everybody voted for except for the Conservative Party.... In fact, it was the first in 2006 that they whipped against legislation. So when my colleagues ask me why I voted against this, I could ask them why they voted against the VIP extension, why they voted against the marriage-after-60 act, why they voted against the.... No, but really, I could do that if I wanted.
The reality is that it was a motion passed by the House of Commons, by the majority of members of Parliament in 2006. It was a motion. As you said, why didn't I move a motion? I did move a motion, and unfortunately after three years, I'm still waiting for the enactment of that motion. As you know, motions are not binding on government. They're just an advisory tool to say to government that here's what we think you should do in the House of Commons.