As Lynne was saying, we have a lot of similar instruments. We have the website. We have communication devices, such as our PAC News, that are sent to our retired members to update them on a variety of issues. One of these is the bridge issue as well; we have communicated that to them before. We have staff relations reps who are able to identify the concerns of regular members and civilian members who contribute to the pension plan, and identify their concerns to our pension advisory committee as well, to advise them on that advice.
The core message, I would say, from the perspective of the RCMPSA, is that we want to ensure that the value of what they put into it is protected. So everything we do allows us to protect that money and that investment they've made. The investment they've made allows for the bridge to take effect at 65 and allows them to contribute less during the course of their career, so it's a positive thing. The only other thing I would add is that we always encourage our members on retirement to seek independent financial advice, because even though you may read it on the web, you may read a variety of documentation. It's probably a good idea to seek a financial expert to ensure that you understood what's being said and what is out there.