Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I thank the advisory group for being here. I really appreciate that and I appreciate all the work that you've done to make these recommendations to make the charter better. I often speak with Betty Hinton, who used to be the parliamentary secretary for this committee. She's still interested and still asks questions about how the charter is coming along. Thank you for your work.
I note one of the challenges in looking at recommendation 2.1, “End the legacy of the insurance-based approach to economic benefits”. I can understand that. Mr. Sharpe explained the disadvantages. But also, I sat as a chair on a claims committee for an insurance company. The challenge is to determine what compensation or award would give a reasonable quality of life. How is that determined? How do you analyze that?
If I may, I'll ask Mr. Sharpe this question. Did you do any research into what they're doing in other countries like Australia, the U.K., or the United States with regard to that issue?