It's okay, I'll take it away in about half an hour.
I have a couple of questions. Going on to your report, where you talk about the earnings loss benefit, it's not considered earned income. I'm seeking your advice, because I think there are issues this committee would like to see changed, especially in and around that economic issue. Why is it that there aren't contributions done on an annual basis for those individuals who are no longer able to work to their CPP, so that when they get to 65 they have a CPP that at least gives them more than the very small amount they would currently get under the examples you put in here?