Yes, that's one of the problems they're faced with: it's all based on getting out; a whole series of things happen when the person gets out. By delaying it two or three years, some of those things are missed. That's one of the issues that was raised here, that somehow we have to get together.
Why are they keeping them in longer when perhaps they should be discharged? Don't get me wrong, there are many places within the military where a person without legs or arms, for instance, can work, and work very effectively. I like that idea. But is that the only reason these people are staying in? Or are there other things having to do with what you get when you get out isn't giving you the amount of money you need to live properly?