I'll tell you exactly what the reasoning was. It was to get away from the ideology of the insurance-based mindset. If we were to try to bring that forward and keep it non-taxable, it would look as if we were trying to go that way. We say it should be just 100% taxable. You're in the military, you're injured, and you're being released, but you're in a transitional phase for two years. You're just kept on the record as being paid, instead of getting into--
On November 26th, 2009. See this statement in context.