I'll say a couple of things. One is that we are constantly looking at the long-term care strategy that the department has within the current eligibility framework. It might be useful for the committee, at some point, to have a more fulsome briefing on that particular aspect. Part of that is looking at needs down the road. Without commenting on specifics today, we have been looking at the needs within the current eligibilities. We've also considered the fact that when new hospitals were built, the social safety net in Canada was relatively non-existent. Basically now there are hundreds of thousands of beds across the country for which the department pays for various types of eligibilities. So it's a fairly complex environment, and I'd like to make that suggestion in response to your comment. You're quite right about the government policy.
The other thing is, if Ste. Anne's opens its beds to civilians.... Whenever we run into a case and learn about a case where there's a spousal separation, we do our level best, working with the provincial authorities, to try to fix that. If Ste. Anne's had beds available, that would give us another option in that community to make a co-location. So there are a number of factors there.