I might toss in--and you could put this under families--that we giveth with one hand and we faileth with the other. We gave the public service health care plan to those veterans who are disabled and to any transitioning Canadian Forces member, but what was not given was the pensioners' dental services plan. I emphasize the very first word: pensioners'. Any young family that's going through life will have their need to get antibiotics, the odd shot, some pills and all that, but the biggest expense—and I found it to be so, and maybe you've found it in raising your families—is when those kids need braces, have cavities, or break a tooth in sports. Dental is very expensive. That's not included in the new Veterans Charter. So they brought in health care for the family, but they didn't do dental. We mentioned that right at the outset.
When you're talking about a lump sum award--and I guess I'm drilling into one through five--there's an earnings loss benefit in the new Veterans Charter. So if you're unable to work and you've been through a rehabilitation plan or program, you may be entitled to 75% of your pre-injury income, reduced by what other sources of income you may be getting. That's all fine and dandy, but that 75% is actually kind of discriminatory, because a lieutenant-colonel's 75% is certainly different from a corporal's 75%. Once again, none of these are recognizing the family. So the corporal or the colonel will get 75%, but where's the family? This is an element that has been misplaced.