Okay.
To follow up on that point—and pardon me if I've misunderstood any of our witnesses-—it seemed to me that a number of witnesses might have been confused about how it worked. They seemed to feel that they would receive a lump sum from Veterans Affairs, and that would be it. I'm sure if you read the testimony you saw that in more than one example. We know that isn't the case.
Where is the disconnect with some of the people who are doing good, hard work lobbying on behalf of veterans, but somehow missing the point there? Is it part of a communication issue at Veterans Affairs? Where is this issue coming from?