I think it's very important, in responding to Monsieur Vincent's comments, to point out that the whole design of the new veterans charter is needs-based. The objective is not simply to provide money to individuals in the absence of need; it is to provide the support they need when the need exists.
To use your example, Monsieur Vincent, most individuals with a lower level of disability, such as 15%--not that you can say everybody with a 15% disability is going to reintegrate--will be able to retrain, reintegrate, and become independent and capable of supporting themselves. That's the goal. It's not to create dependency in individuals so that for the rest of their lives they are dependent on payments from the government. Not everybody can do that, but for those who can that's ideally the goal. It's to provide the right level of support when they need it to get them to that point. It's important to recognize that and not think simply about how much money transfers to them over a lifetime.
One of the significant problems with the old pension act and the disability pension payment was the amount of money that was provided in relation to the time when it was needed. Paradoxically, it didn't provide enough when they were younger, raising families, and really needed it. In many cases they will get more later in life, but that's not when they actually need it. So I just want to make that important point about the needs-based provision.