It is an issue. We recognize that. I think you are right to point out that communications could be part of that. My colleague Anne-Marie may wish to speak to that in more detail. We have certainly undertaken many efforts to try to clarify that communication, but there continues to be a lot of focus on the disability award specifically, and it tends to be viewed in the light of being a one-time payment and then that is it: you spend it, it's gone, and the support is over. In fact, the opposite of that is the truth, and the opposite of that is what the design of what the new Veterans Charter was all about. It was designed to be there, built on a philosophy of the support being available to you when you need it.
The notion around the one-time lump sum and the payment up front was, to the extent that it is possible, that it allows a veteran to accept that the injury has been recognized. That recognition has been provided. There has been some level of compensation provided. You can't undo it. If they have lost their legs, you can't put them back, and there is no amount of money that is going to really compensate them for that loss, but that is the intent of that program. It's an entitlement-based provision of money. Everything else in the new Veterans Charter is needs-based, and that support is there, and it's there indefinitely.