Thank you very much, Mr. Chair. It does squeeze our time way down. There's obviously a lot we could be talking about. I do want to say thank you again to both of you for coming in. It's a difficult topic, with difficult areas.
We're not going to even get near touching the sorts of things we could talk about. I agree with those who say a future time, a future issue.
I'm pleased you responded to Mr. Stoffer on the review committee's 16 recommendations. Because we have so much to focus on, we at least want to know that we have a core of things there.
I would like to raise the question of the ombudsman, and then I'm going to share my time with Mr. McColeman.
I was a little concerned about that, and I don't want to get into your personal details so much as that we were kind of exposed to the ombudsman as being very independent. He goes out and does what he wants to do and makes public statements, and so on.
You're raising a different concept on that, and I'd like you to expand on that just a little bit, because we feel that the ombudsman is an important component of a long-term process that works. I know he considers himself often to be quite independent and he's made that point quite clearly, so maybe there's more work to be done. But perhaps you could just expand on that, and then I'll go to Mr. McColeman for a second question.