In terms of how the disability is assessed, a table of disabilities is used that looks at how the disability affects one's ability to function. But in legislation there is a 100% cap on the amount that can be payable.
Someone can reach 100%, and different people can have different profiles and be at 100%. We've heard the criticism from a number of different groups that it doesn't seem fair that someone who is a bilateral amputee gets 100%, and someone who loses one arm and three digits gets 100%, and someone who loses three limbs gets 100%. I think some of the financial benefits in place are intended to recognize that. But it's certainly been a criticism we've heard and have been listening to: are there other means of financial compensation that should be given in those kinds of circumstances? In legislation, the cap is 100%.