I would start by saying that absolutely I have the opportunity to raise concerns and do analysis and listen to what's being said and form my own opinion based on that analysis and communicate it. Of course, that work is currently ongoing.
As you know, we've had a number of reports tabled by special committees: the new Veterans Charter advisory group, the special needs advisory group. These groups are comprised of not only stakeholders, with representatives from the Legion and other veterans organizations, but also experts in the field of rehabilitation, disability management, and occupational therapy.
We've certainly been listening to them. My experience to date has been similar to what Monsieur Vincent was pointing out, in terms of whether we're doing enough for those who have catastrophic injuries. Does it make sense to give the same amount to those individuals, and are we giving them enough to support them over their lifetime? As you pointed out, if we're paying someone at the level of a senior private, is that enough to sustain them over their lifetime?
I think the answer is yes, I certainly have that opportunity, but I firmly believe that the package that is there is a good package. It has a firm foundation, it's based on the right principles, and it's heavily weighted in terms of the research base that supports it. That's not to say that there shouldn't be some building on it to address gaps, but that analysis is ongoing.