No. That is correct.
What the new Veterans Charter essentially does is set up an entirely new rehabilitation support scheme. As part of setting up all these rehabilitation supports and approaching the question in such a different capacity, you have to think about the compensation scheme that goes along with it. When you are thinking about disability management principles, there is a basic premise that you can't pay people more money to stay at home than to go to work. You have to strike the balance with providing enough of a financial benefits stream that people can live with dignity and be supported, or in cases where they can go back to work, that they have an incentive to go back to work. Trying to strike that balance is pretty important.
All of the wellness programs are there, and then the financial stream is twofold. One is the lump sum—the disability award, which is recognizing some of the non-economic impacts of disability; it's quality-of-life factors, those kinds of components. Then there's the second set of benefits, which includes the earnings loss benefit, a permanent impairment allowance, the supplementary retirement benefit. That is the ongoing, monthly financial stream, which continues to be available. What is different is that it's based on their salary and is payable to them while they're participating in the rehabilitation program, or if they are unable to work, is payable to them until age 65.