Thank you.
I'm going to provide you with the opportunity to elaborate a bit more, but I first have to say you are a great advocate on behalf of not only your son but many other men and women who are concerned and have come before the committee.
I agree with you. I think the issue is how you live on 75%, if it's $700 a month. You get a package deal of $260,000 if you're lucky, and you have a lot of other support programs and so on. But the reality is that you then have to live on $700 a month, which is 75% of what a young man would have been earning. That would create a whole lot of other problems.
I certainly share some of the concerns--I suspect all of us do--and we are trying to make changes. What kinds of changes would you advocate then?
He's a young man. He lost a lot of years, which is why he partially gets a lump sum. What changes do you think we should be doing? If it's not 75%, what should it be?