Again, I think the lump sum award has to be viewed in the context of the entire package, the entire suite of programs. The lump sum award is not designed to provide an income support. It's designed basically as a form of compensation and a recognition of the contribution and the disability suffered by a member. It has to be viewed simply as one piece of the overall package, which includes, as we've discussed, the broad range of financial benefits that are payable.
We are hearing of these concerns, but again, they have to be viewed in the bigger picture, and we have to look at fundamental questions in terms of, I suppose, how the lump sum was set originally. Again, if you recall, that was based on previous discussions on this point and based on the comparators with civil awards in the court system and workers' compensation awards in provincial sectors, and it was considered very much in line with the types of payments being made in those contexts.
So again, from our point of view, the focus must always be in the context of the award as one component of the bigger picture of benefits available under the charter to individual members.