I'd like to continue.
Earlier, you said that no savings would be realized. However, consider the award provided to someone who is 80% disabled because of post-traumatic stress disorder or some other trauma. Compare that amount to a $220,863 lump disability award. Let's say that a veteran who is 80% disabled receives 80% of his salary upon release from military service. If that CF member earned $40,000 or $50,000 a year, had 30 years of service when his career ended and was still alive at the age of 65, clearly he would receive more than the $280,000 or the $220,000 that you are giving him. So then, it's more cost-effective for you to provide an award of $220,000 instead of 80% of his salary. Would you agree with that assessment?