No, it would not. If you look at G-5.1, you'll see the actual wording of (2). There is no (a) and (b) anymore. There is (1)(a) and (b) and then (2).
On October 21st, 2010. See this statement in context.
On October 21st, 2010. See this statement in context.
October 21st, 2010 / 4:50 p.m.
Conservative
The Acting Chair Conservative David Sweet
No, it would not. If you look at G-5.1, you'll see the actual wording of (2). There is no (a) and (b) anymore. There is (1)(a) and (b) and then (2).
See context to find out what was said next.