It happens, and I think that all our tribunal members want the veterans not only to receive as much benefit as possible from all the information they are given, but also, if things are lacking when they leave, to understand what they require and that they do have the time to go out and find other evidence. It doesn't necessarily have to be a better medical report; it could be a witness's testimony or any number of things. The role of the adjudicator is to then take all that information and use it to apply the law and the benefit of the doubt as much as possible in favour of the applicant, and I think we do that very well.
What's also important for the benefit of the veterans and the clients who come before us is that there is no limitation period. As I said earlier, when they are not satisfied with a review and bring the case on appeal, they have a representative and they have time to gather additional information. Some information from our traditional veterans is very difficult to find, but that is often brought forward by testimony from members of the family or by statements from friends who were present with them if it was an activity in the service and there's little record of it. All that information is gathered and taken up, so when we talk about credible evidence, it can be in many forms.