For me to put the testimony of the witness into context, it is, frankly, important for me to understand where that is coming from. I understand the Legion's independence. It is well known to all of us and it has been well stated. The office of the ombudsman is less clear. That's why, for me to understand the testimony, I think it's a very fair question, and I'm pleased with the ombudsman's answer. That's not a problem.
But I think it is defensive of the government members, perhaps, to be worried about this, so I would like that on the record as well. The defensiveness, I think, is more concerning to me than the clarification that we are trying to ascertain the nature of the evidence that he is presenting.
With respect to that, does your term have an end point?