That is clearer. Now I understand.
Mr. Stogran, according to your annual report last year, for 2008-2009, you had difficulty collecting information. It had to do with unlimited access in terms of the veterans charter analysis. Was there an improvement? Is it better? Do you have more information on that?
Furthermore, as you know, there is a review and appeal board that hears cases. Should the board's decisions—we know it is an administrative board that holds public hearings—be made public? That is the case with all boards in Quebec. All decisions are available on the Internet. This would make it possible to see the case law that the panel relied on in making its decisions. As things stand now, we have no insight into that. We do not know how the panel comes to its decisions. In my view, it is not just you, Mr. Ombudsman, who should have access to that information, but the public as well. It would help in terms of making submissions and seeing what was said in previous cases.