I've never actually been at a VRAB meeting myself, but I'm told by other people who have that in order to introduce something new, it has to be new evidence and nothing else. It can't be anything that's been written or brought up in the past, because that's already been considered, and that's why you've been turned down; otherwise, you wouldn't be there at the VRAB deliberation.
It has to be new evidence. It has to be something different, outside the VAC policy, but more or less new evidence. They find it quite intimidating. That's really the only example I can give you, sir.