Okay.
This is for the people who are not going to read the entire report but just hear what we have to say today. Your report, the way I've broken it down, talks about two things really. It talks about exposure to DU, and it talks about the effects of exposure. For the conclusion, and to restate what you've already said many times, although there has been exposure, you think, in your estimation, and that's what's laid out in your report, that the exposure has not caused adverse health effects to our veterans. Is that correct?