I'm conscious of time. Certainly, as several of my colleagues on the committee have mentioned, we do have veterans who served our country with distinction but, as Madame Papillon described it, have persistent symptoms. A lot have idiopathic illnesses, illnesses that essentially can't be attributed. It's been suggested by Mr. Casey and Mr. Zimmer that this report allows us to look at new avenues of what possibly could be causing these symptoms.
Do you find that's a conclusion you can draw from this study that given the unlikelihood of exposure, and the unlikelihood of DU presence with any of our soldiers, we should be exploring other possible causes of some of these idiopathic illnesses?