I think it's fair to say that both in the U.K. and the U.S....but I am less familiar with the latter. I was asked to go there to make some comments on its monitoring program, but that was a while ago and I'm not sure what's happening now.
My feeling is that there is still monitoring. The biggest problem they had in the U.K. is that when we asked people whether they wanted to have measurements, a large fraction of the people who were approached didn't want to bother.
But there will be continuing monitoring, as there always is. We have monitoring now. We're seeing some cancers that were induced in military personnel by the explosions from nuclear weapons testing after the war. There is possibly some excess there.
We're still monitoring our populations, and people do it all the time. It's exactly the same in Canada, where we're monitoring our nuclear workers. There's a continual monitoring of them to make sure there's no excess adverse health effects in the worker population.